Komparasi Kemampuan Penalaran matematis mahasiswa ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif

  • Farah Heniati Santosa Universitas Nahdlatul Wathan Mataram
  • Habib Ratu Perwira Negara Universitas Bumigora Mataram
  • Indrawati Universitas Nahdlatul Wathan Mataram
  • Samsul Bahri Universitas Nahdlatul Wathan Mataram
  • Samsuriadi Universitas Nahdlatul Wathan Mataram
Keywords: Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis, PBL, Gaya Kognitif

Abstract

This study aims to obtain a picture of the achievement of mathematical reasoning abilities of students who obtain PBL learning in terms of cognitive fields dependent and field independent. This research is a quasi-experiment involving 97 first semester students. Analysis of the study used one way ANAVA. The research instruments were cognitive style tests and mathematical reasoning abilities tests. The results of the study concluded that there are differences in students' mathematical reasoning abilities that have field dependent and field independent cognitive styles, that is, students with independent field cognitive styles have better mathematical reasoning abilities compared to students with field dependent cognitive styles.

References

Bahar, M. & Hansell, M. (2000). The relationship between some psychological factors and their effects on the performance of grid questions and word association tests. Educa tional Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 20, 349–363.

Bilal Atasoy, Guyer Tolga, dan Sibel Somyurek. 2008. The Effect Of Individual Differeces on Learner’s Navigation in a Courseware. The Turkish Online Journal of Educatinal Technology. Vol. 7, issue 2 article 4, pp. 32-40.

Brendefur, J., & Frykholm, J. (2000). Promoting mathematical communication in the classroom: Two preservice teachers' conceptions and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(2), 125-153.

Figen Bozkus, Ulku Ayvaz. (2018). Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge of Mathematical Reasoning. European Journal of Education Studies. 4(9), 16-34.

Franke, M.L., Webb, N.W, Chan, A.G., Ing, M., Freund, D. & Battey, D. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students' mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, (60) 4, 380-392.

Grigorenko, E.L., & Sternberg, R.J. (1995). Thinking styles. In D.H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence. (pp. 205 –29) New York, NY: Plenum.

Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., Noh, T. & Koh, H. (2005). The influence of students’ cognitive and motivational variables in respect of cognitive conflict and conceptual change. Inter-national Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1037–1058.

Kepner, MD, & Neimark, ED. 1984. Test-retest Reliability and Differensial Pattern of Score Change on the Group Embedded Figures Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 (6), 1405-1413.

Kilpatrick, J., Jane Swafford, & B. Findell. 2001. Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. United States: The National Academies Press.

Mousavi, Shima, Radmehr, Farzad, Alamolhodaei, Hasan. 2012. The Role of Mathematical Homework and Prior Knowledge on the Relationship between Students' Mathematical Performance, Cognitive Style and Working Memory Capacity. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology. 10(3), 1223-1248.

Murphy, H. J., Casey, B., Day, D. A., & Young, J. D. (1997). Scores on the Group Embedded Figures Test by undergraduates in information management. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 1135-1138.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.No Child Left Behind [NCLB] Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115, Stat. 1425 (2002).

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.

Negara, HRP., Budiyono, Sujadi, I. (2015), Eksperimentasi model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe think pair share (TPS) dengan assessment for learning (Afl) terhadap prestasi belajar dan kemampuan komunikasi matematis pada materi segiempat ditinjau dari gaya kognitif siswa. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika. 3(1). 97 – 112.

Oh, Eunjoo., Lim, Doohun. (2005). Cross Relationships Between Cognitive Styles and Learner Variables in Online Learning Environment. Journal Of Interaktive Online Learning. Vol. 4, No. 1, pp.55-66.

Pape, S. J., Bell, C. V., & Yetkin, İ. E. (2003). Developing mathematical thinking and self-regulated learning: A teaching experiment in a seventh-grade mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53(3), 179-202.

Pascual-Leone, J. (1989). An organismic process model of Witkin’s field dependence– inde-pendence. In T. Globerson & T. Zelniker (Eds.), Cognitive style and cognitive develop-ment (pp. 36–70). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Quiroga, M. A., & González, A. (1988). Guía documental y análisis bibliométrico sobre los estilos cognitivos y los controles cognitivos. Investigaciones Psicológicas, 5, 177-235.

Riding, R. J., & Smith. E.S. 1997. Cognitive Style and Learning Strategies: Some Implications for Trainiing Design. International Journal of Training and Development, Vol. 1(3), 199-208.

Rosenstein, J.G., Caldwell, J.H., & Crown, W.D. (1996). New Jersey Mathematics Curriculum Framework: A collaborative effort of the New Jersey Mathematics Coalition and the New Jersey Department of Education. New Brunswick, NJ: The New Jersey Mathematics Coalition, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.

Santosa, Farah Heniati & Bahri, Samsul. (2019). Kemampuan komunikasi matematis mahasiswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran PBL dan mind mapping ditinjau dari gaya kognitif. JP3M: jurnal pemikiran dan penelitian pendidikan matematika, 2(1), 54-65.

Tan, Oon-Sen. (2004). Enchancing Thingking Through Problem Based Learning Approaches. Lorong Chuan: Cengage Learning.

Tinajero, C., & Páramo, M.F. (1998). Field dependence –independence cognitive style and academic achievement: A review of research and theory. European Journal of Psychol-ogy of Education, 13(2), 227–251.

Tsaparlis, G. (2005). Non-algorithmic quantitative problem solving in university physical chemistry: A correlation study of the role of selective cognitive factors. Research in Sci-ence and Technological Education, 23, 125–148.

Winkel, W.S. (2005). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive style: Essence and origins. New York: International Universities Press.

Witkin, H.A., Dyk, R.B., Paterson, H.F., Goodenough, D.R. & Karp, S.A. (1974). Psycho-logical differentiation. New York: Wiley.

Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Published
2020-01-20
How to Cite
Santosa, F. H., Negara, H. R. P., Indrawati, Bahri, S., & Samsuriadi. (2020). Komparasi Kemampuan Penalaran matematis mahasiswa ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika (JP3M), 2(2), 142-153. https://doi.org/10.36765/jp3m.v2i2.68